Define one job
Start with one ordered stream and one detection objective. Keep behavioral fields; remove IDs, labels, secrets, timestamps, and post-event truth from the encoder.
sample + objective → encoder v1Engrammatic scores structured events as they arrive and sends a bounded novelty signal to your existing SIEM, log platform, or fraud stack. You keep the system of record. We add one source-specific encoder, one job, and one decision report.
Engrammatic is a coprocessor, not a replacement for Splunk, Datadog, Hydrolix, a SIEM, or your data lake. It produces an anomaly candidate while the event is in motion; your existing tools retain, search, investigate, and enforce policy. Platform and OEM teams can embed the same lane without displacing customer storage.
Start with one ordered stream and one detection objective. Keep behavioral fields; remove IDs, labels, secrets, timestamps, and post-event truth from the encoder.
sample + objective → encoder v1The job maps each event to a binary hypervector and compares it with a bounded set of learned prototypes using XOR and popcount.
event → binary vector → distanceSend high-novelty candidates to the alert or investigation path you already own. The profile, threshold, and model checksum stay versioned.
score + lineage → existing workflowThe evaluation is designed to let the simplest adequate route win. Engrammatic earns a place only when joint context matters and the measured alert burden is acceptable.
Flag a new service, path, identity state, and network combination before the full record lands in the investigation store.
Rank unfamiliar publisher, campaign, device, geography, and velocity combinations for downstream fraud verification.
Detect a node version, chain or region, network state, and load combination that normal metric thresholds do not express.
The console preserves the encoder fingerprint, model checksum, source digest, acceptance limits, and run receipt. Synthetic data can verify the workflow; only representative customer data can establish customer quality.
The first 60% builds the bounded shadow; the final 40% stays untouched. With a usable label, the report shows average precision, recall, and false alerts per 10,000 normal events.
Compare HDC with frequency sketch and Bloom membership evidence. If the cheaper baseline wins on the declared objective, use it.
Throughput, latency, resilience, and cost must pass on the selected AWS instance and region before a production claim is allowed.
Bring one stream and one question. We help define the encoder, freeze acceptance limits, run the untouched holdout, and return evidence you can challenge.
10,000–20,000 representative events for a first browser pass, plus a binary outcome label when available.
Pin fields, numeric ranges, dimension, seed, routing, capacity, output, and retention to immutable versions.
Set minimum average precision and recall plus the maximum alert burden before the holdout is scored.
Advance, tune, or use the simpler baseline. Download the PDF with metrics, lineage, boundaries, and next steps.
Start with a bounded evaluation. Production data, capacity, retention, deletion, and security requirements are agreed before the scope expands.
Data: hosted synchronous scoring runs in memory. Guided managed replay can durably stage bounded batches for retry and audit. In-VPC scoring is available to design partners.
Security: a DPA is available on request. SOC 2 Type II is on the roadmap, not claimed as complete.
Stage: Engrammatic is early and working with design partners. Production readiness is decided per job, not implied by the website.
No. It means the field combination is unfamiliar under the attached profile. Customer labels, policy, and investigation establish meaning.
No. Engrammatic sits beside the ingest path and supplies a bounded novelty signal. Your existing platform remains the system of record and investigation surface.
No. An encoder belongs to one semantic context and one objective. Its fields, operators, dimension, seed, placement, and fingerprint are versioned and attached to the job.
Representative labelled quality, alert burden, target-instance throughput and latency, resilience, cost, security, and operating procedures. Development evidence does not waive those gates.
Run a representative sample, compare the baselines, and keep Engrammatic only if the evidence supports it.